Kling 4.0vsWan3.0

Kling 4.0 and Wan3.0 are the two 30-second video models from China's biggest platforms, and both are closed, hosted products. Kling 4.0 leads on control, with up to 10 keyframes and 4K stereo output, but the full model and API are still landing. Wan3.0 is live on Alibaba Cloud with transparent per-second pricing and an unusual document-to-video mode.

At a glance

Kling 4.0Wan3.0
CategoryVideoVideo
FunctionVideo generationVideo generation
PricingPaidPaid
Starting priceFlash early access on Kling Ultra Yearly plans; full model and API pricing in October$0.05 per output second at 480p, $0.10 at 720p, $0.20 at 1080p (a 30-second 1080p clip is $6)
ReleasedSeptember 2026August 2026

Kling 4.0

Pros

  • Keyframe steering gives directors real control over a long clip
  • Flash tier is already usable while the full model finishes
  • Kling's physics and character consistency carried forward

Cons

  • Full model, API, and pricing not yet available
  • Early access limited to annual Ultra subscribers
  • HDR is announced, not shipped

Wan3.0

Pros

  • Transparent per-second pricing
  • Document-to-video is unusual and useful for explainers
  • Twice the clip length of the previous generation

Cons

  • Closed and API-only — no weights, unlike Wan 2.x
  • Alibaba Cloud account required
  • Content policies and data residency considerations of a Chinese-hosted service

Which one should you pick?

Pick Kling 4.0 if

You direct clips with keyframes and references, want 4K with sound, and are already a Kling Ultra subscriber who can use Flash now.

See Kling 4.0 details →

Pick Wan3.0 if

You need an API with published per-second prices today, want to turn documents, slides, or web pages into explainer video, or build on Alibaba Cloud.

See Wan3.0 details →

Bottom line

Wan3.0 for shipping today with predictable costs. Kling 4.0 for control and quality once the full model and API arrive in October. Both are closed; neither is the open-weight option Wan 2.x was.