Head-to-head comparison
Figma MakevsLovable
Both turn a prompt into a working web interface, but they start from different places. Figma Make lives inside Figma and can build from your existing design files; Lovable starts from a blank prompt and produces a full app with a database and auth via Supabase.
At a glance
| Figma Make | Lovable | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Coding | Coding |
| Function | Design-to-app | Full-stack AI |
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| Starting price | Limited free use; included with Figma Full seat plans | Free credits, Pro $20/mo |
| Editor rating | — | 4.6 / 5 |
| Released | May 2025 | November 2023 |
Figma Make
Pros
- The only AI builder that starts from your actual design files
- Prototypes are interactive and shareable in minutes
- No extra subscription if your team already has Figma Full seats
Cons
- Output is a prototype or small app, not a production backend
- Credit limits on lower seats fill up fast
- Less flexible than developer-first builders like Lovable or v0 for real apps
Lovable
Pros
- Best for non-coders
- Production-ready output
- Polished UX
Cons
- React/Supabase stack only
- Credit limits restrictive
Which one should you pick?
Pick Figma Make if
You already design in Figma, want interactive prototypes that respect your design system, and mainly need something to test and share rather than deploy as a product.
See Figma Make details →Pick Lovable if
You want a real, deployable app with a backend, user accounts, and a GitHub repo you can hand to developers — and you are starting from an idea rather than a finished design.
See Lovable details →Bottom line
Figma Make for designers prototyping from designs. Lovable for founders shipping an actual product. If the output needs to survive contact with real users, Lovable; if it needs to survive a design review, Figma Make.